THE STORY OF YOUR ENSLAVEMENT

From the time your parents listed you on the Crown Birth Register. You become the chattel property of the Crown Corporation

“The Crown Corporation has copyrighted the birth certificate legal name and "assigned" it back to you so you can act as the SURETY for any debt..."

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God [John 1 KJV]”

God created Man: “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. [John 6-7 KJV]”

Man then created Government to Act in the Capacity of “Fiduciary Trustees” who are PUBLIC SERVANTS, to carry out the Will of the People and manage service tasks such as building roads and maintaining public services etc and who write Legislative Acts and Statutes that are the by-laws of that CORPORATION and apply to ALL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES;

The CORPORATE GOVERNMENT created Legislation called: The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1874

That was: “An Act to amend the Law relating to the Registration of Births and Deaths in England, and to consolidate the Law respecting the Registration of Births and Deaths at Sea” That stated at Par’ 1:

[1] Information concerning birth to be given to registrar within forty-two days

“In the case of every child born alive after the commencement of this Act, it shall be the duty of the father and mother of the child, and in default of the father and mother, of the occupier of the house in which to his knowledge the child is born, and of each person present at the birth, and of the person having charge of the child, to give to the registrar, within forty-two days next after such birth, information of the particulars required to be registered concerning such birth, and in the presence of the registrar to sign the register”.

The Same “Act” further stated at Par’ 39:

[39] Penalty for not giving information, complying with the requisition, &c

Every person required by the Births and Deaths Registration Acts, 1836 to 1874, to give information concerning any birth or death., or any living new-born child, or any dead body, who wilfully refuses to answer any question put to him by the registrar relating to the particulars required to be registered concerning such birth or death, or fails to comply with any requisition of the registrar made in- pursuance of those Acts, and every person who refuses or fails without reasonable excuse to give or send any certificate in accordance with the provisions of the said Acts, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding forty shillings for each offence; and the parent of any child who fails to give information concerning the birth of such child, as required by the said Acts, shall be liable to a like penalty; and a person required by the said Acts to give information concerning a death in the first instance, and not merely in default of some other person, shall, if such information as is required by the said Acts is not duly given, be liable to the same penalty.

So (just to be clear) if any “person” required by the “Act” wilfully refuses to answer any question put to him by the registrar relating to the particulars required to be registered concerning such birth or death, or fails to comply with any requisition of the registrar shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding forty shillings for each offense…

Of course, times change and now if any “person” required by the “Act” wilfully refuses to answer any question put to him by the registrar its now Level 1 on the standard charges (pursuant to the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953); [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/1-2/20/contents]

The wording on the various Government Acts and Statutes are all willfully ambiguous and open to interpretation and as most people are beginning to realise these various Acts and Statutes are actually written in legalise that looks and sounds like English but is completely different in interpretation…

REQUISITION means A demand in writing, or a formal request or requirement. Atwood v. Charlton, 21 RI. 568, 45 A. 580.

The taking or seizure of property by government. Benedict v. U. S., D.C.N.Y., 271 F. 714. – [Black’s Law 4th edition]

So now we see that they are: Demanding, taking, and seizing property under threat of financial penalty… a.k.a under duress;

But… What Property are they taking?

Your God-Given Name aka Your Title, Your Property and Rights…

What do they do with it? well, if you read the birth certificate and it says: I, Registrar of Births and Deaths for the Sub-district of [name of sub-district], in the LONDON BOROUGH OF [NAME OF BOROUGH] do hereby certify that this is a true copy of the entry No. in the Register of Births for the said Sub-district and that such Register is now legally in my custody;

CUSTODY means: The care and keeping of anything; as when an article is said to be “in the custody of the court.” Also the detainer of a man’s person by virtue of lawful process or authority; actual imprisonment. 59 Pa. St. 320 – [Black’s Law 4th edition]

So now we are beginning to see the bigger picture…

The Government wrote an act of Requisition taking or seizing property under penalty ie. under duress and then taking the property (the name of your offspring into their custody).

Then using your offsprings God-given name ie: John Henry and John Henry’s family name ie Doe, they then create the Crown copyrighted LEGAL PERSON: Mr John Henry DOE/ JOHN HENRY DOE (and other derivatives thereof), which is now done pursuant to the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988, which says at section 163:

163 Crown copyright

(1) Where a work is made by Her Majesty or by an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties—

(a) the work qualifies for copyright protection notwithstanding section 153(1) (ordinary requirement as to qualification for copyright protection), and

(b) Her Majesty is the first owner of any copyright in the work.

So lets break it down… Where a work is made by Her Majesty or by an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties…

The “work” in question is the creation of the LEGAL PERSON aka LEGAL FICTION/ Strawman/ Ens Legis Person… by an officer (the Office of Registrar General) or servant (the LEGAL FICTION of the child’s Parents) of the Crown and “Her Majesty” aka the Crown “is the first owner of any copyright in the work”

OWNER means: The person in whom is vested the ownership, dominion, or title of property; proprietor. He who has dominion of a “thing”, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, which he has a right to enjoy and do with as he pleases, even to spoil or destroy it, as far as the law permits, unless he be prevented by some agreement or covenant which restrains his right. Bouvier – [Black’s Law 4th edition]

As previously shown: The PERSON is taken into “Custody” and is then copyrighted by an officer or servant of the Crown (Registrar General) and the “work” aka the “thing” becomes the property of the Crown where “Her Majesty” aka the Crown is the “first owner” of any copyright in the work”

Where property is taken into custody, this creates an act known as “Bailment” where the offsprings mother and/or father become the Bailor’s (the parties bailing the property) and the Registrar General (part of the CROWN CORPORATION) become the bailee, which might go some way to explaining the name of one of if not the most famous courts in the land: The Old Bailey…

Just to be clear on the matter, anyone who creates a “Register” puts a list of their property on it to demonstrate that its their property.

 

REGISTER means: An officer authorised by law to keep a record called a “register” or “registry” as the register for the probate of wills.

A book containing a record of facts as they occur, kept by public.; authority; a register of births, marriages, and burials.

REGISTRANT means: One who registers; particularly, one who registers anything (e. g., a trade-mark) for the purpose of securing a right or privilege granted by law on condition of such registration.

REGISTRAR GENERAL means: In English law. An officer appointed by the crown under the great seal, to whom, subject to such regulations as shall be made by a principal secretary of state, the general superintendence of the whole system of registration of births. deaths, and marriages is entrusted. 3 Steph. ComIll. 234.

So the Registrar General is “entrusted” with the property aka the “work”, aka the “thing” (In Rem) that is held in custody and the thing that has now become copyrighted is now the property of “Her Majesty” as “Her Majesty” is the “first owner of any copyright in the work”

So one thought that might spring to mind is: If you are the owner of a dog and that dog bites someone. Then aren’t you the ‘owner’ the liable party? – YES…

So far we have seen that the act of registration has created the LEGAL PERSON a Mr John Henry DOE, that is copyrighted and owned by “Her Majesty” (aka the Crown) because the mum and/or dad were forced by an act of requisition under duress to hand in their offsprings property (Title, Property and Rights) into “Custody” to be held on the Register by the “Bailee” (Registrar General) in Trust… and this created the “thing”

So let’s take a closer look at the “thing” aka LEGAL PERSON/ STRAWMAN…

PERSON means: A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. [1 bouv. Inst. no. 137.]

A human being considered as capable of having rights and of being charged with duties; while a “thing” is the object over which rights may be exercised.

Persons are divided by law into natural and artificial.

Natural persons are such as the God of nature formed us; Artificial are such as are created and devised by human laws, for the purposes of society and government, which are called “corporations” or “bodies politic”. 1 HI. Comm. 123. – [Black’s Law 4th edition]

So if “Persons are divided by law into natural and artificial” then the closest in law to the living man/ woman is the Natural Person (even though its an oxymoron as a PERSON is man made, so how can something thats man made be natural?), and

We can now clearly see that Artificial Persons are created and devised by human laws, for the purposes of society and government, which are called “corporations” or “bodies politic.”

In other words: The LEGAL “ARTIFICIAL” PERSON is [a] “corporations” or “bodies politic.”

This fact can be clearly demonstrated in the Representation of the People Act 1983:

202 General provisions as to interpretation

(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires—

Schedule 1 to this Act;

“person” includes (without prejudice to the provisions of the M1 Interpretation Act 1978) an association corporate or unincorporate;

When the word “Includes” is used it means: Anything not included is excluded, or the inclusion of one is the exclusion of the other. In other words: If its not included then its excluded. So “person” includes an association corporate or unincorporate;

In other words: [a] CORPORATION thats either incorporated or unincorporated.

So the LEGAL PERSON aka STRAWMAN aka the “thing” (In Rem) is the “COMPANY” that is owned by “Her Majesty” aka the “Crown” and is therefore under the jurisdiction of the Crown and shall be governed by statutory legislation. When the Government introduce legislation such as the Coronavirus Act 2020, it applies to LEGAL PERSONS and NOT living men or women.